We found that there was a central vertex dividing the decision component in two parts: Editor Decision Complete is the demarcation between events before (review process) and after decision (decision communication). Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected) The use of editorial management systems as digital infrastructures for the management of collaboration hence requires processual knowledge about the peer review process. The remaining network has only 96 edges and a density of d = 0.02, and a core-periphery structure becomes visible (see Figure 4, right). The editor decides about opening and closing the external review (expressed by Manuscript Consultation Session Started (N = 5,816) and Manuscript Consultation Ended (N = 2,010)). One possibility is that it will be accepted as is, which is extremely rare. We thank Taiane Linhares and Nikita Sorgatz for help with data preparation. Journal decisions 6.
Dr. Katharina Weiss-Tuider - LinkedIn Furthermore, the following events were attributed to postulation: Manuscript File Added (N = 6,356), Manuscript File Replaced (N = 3,261) and Manuscript Withdrawn (N = 228), the latter being attributed to postulation because authors can decide as to whether they want to keep or withdraw their claim. The phase of data collection was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within project 01PQ16003. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. According to Guston (2001), there is a social contract granting autonomy and self-regulation to science only if scientific quality and productivity is ensured. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Valuable insights were gained from the categorization of events into the process element categories. The numbers indicate, how often a specific decision is reached for the respective version (the in-degree of the node). These representations on the one hand relate to the effort and the diversity of activities that go into scientific publishing (Taubert, 2016), but on the other hand, differences in the representation of peer review activities may also point to recent tensions in publishing as events indicating oversight or control may be expressions of commercial interest (Horbach and Halffman, 2019, p.12).
Does the status 'Decision in process' without peer review imply [CDATA[// >